DCU Anti-Bullying Centre header
DCU Anti-Bullying Centre
Title Image for Report on a National Survey of Student Experiences of Bullying in Higher Education Institutions in Ireland

Report on a National Survey of Student Experiences of Bullying in Higher Education Institutions in Ireland

Dr Michael Goldrick 
Dr Debbie Ging 
Dr Irene Connolly 
Mr Éamon Jones

This report is published by 
DCU Anti-Bullying Centre (ABC), Dublin City University 

ISBN 978-1-911669-57-9


Content Warning

This survey study investigated respondents’ experiences of bullying in Higher Level Education. Please avail of the below support services in case the content of this report is distressing to you or makes you feel uncomfortable.

Service

Phone

Webpage

Text 50808

Free 24/7 Support in a Crisis – Text “HELLO” to 50808

https://text50808.ie/

Samaritans

National Helpline – 116 123

https://www.samaritans.org/ireland/sama ritans-ireland/

HAS

 

https://www.hsa.ie/eng/Workplace_Healt h/Bullying_at_Work/Are_you_being_Bullie d/

HSE

 

https://www2.hse.ie/wellbeing/mentalhealth/dealing-with-bullying-at-wor…

LGBT Ireland

National LGBT Helpline 1800 929 539

https://lgbt.ie/

USI

(01) 7099 300

https://usi.ie/contact-us/

 

Contents

Report on a National Survey of Student Experiences of Bullying in Higher Education Institutions in Ireland

Content Warning

Contents 

Preface

Executive Summary 

Introduction 

The multiple ecologies of Higher Education 

1. Aims of the Present Survey Study 

2. Methods 

3.Sample 

4. KEY FINDINGS 

4.1 Negative Acts Experienced as a student

4.2 Negative Acts Experienced Offline 

4.3 Negative Acts Experienced as a student in online scenarios 

4.4 Negative acts across different gender identities 

4.5 Negative acts across different sexual orientations 

4.6 Negative acts across different ethnic identities 

4.7 Negative acts among respondents with a disability or neurodiversity 

4.8 Negative Acts across Different Age Groups

4.9 Negative Acts across Different Student groups 

4.10 Status of the Perpetrator 

4.11 Impact of Negative Acts on Respondents

4.12 Student experiences of negative acts whilst on work placement, or practicum

4.13 Bystander Behaviour

4.14 Anti-Bullying Culture and Awareness of Anti-bullying Policies

5. Discussion 

Gender

Sexual Orientation

Ethnic Minority Groups 

Disability or Neurodiversity

Age differences within full-time and part-time students

Status of the Perpetrator 

Impact on Respondents

Bystander Behaviour 

Anti-Bullying Culture and Policies

6. Recommendations 

6.1 Awareness, Education and Training 

6.2 Supports for Faculty

6.3 Supporting Targets of Bullying and Bystanders 

6.4 Evidence-Based Programmes 

6.5 Anti-Bullying Policies 

6.6 Ongoing research to further explore bullying in HEIs

APPENDIX 

Methods

Survey Development 

How did students take part in the survey? 

Ethical Considerations

Survey Instruments

Section 1: Demographics

Section 2: Experiences within social learning environments 

Section 4: Experiences of witnessing bullying and/or cyberbullying of someone in your college

Data Analysis 

Survey 

Plain Language Statement 

Survey of the Experiences of Higher Education Students in Ireland 

Plain Language Statement 

Informed Consent Sheet 

Informed Consent Sheet 

Anonymous Online Informed Consent Form

Survey Instrument 

Experiences of Bullying within Higher Education. 

(Q20) PART 2: 

Experiences within social learning environments

Part 3: Experiences of Bullying Others

References


This report has been prepared for the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science by Dublin City University (DCU) Anti-Bullying Centre (ABC), a national centre for education and research on bullying and online safety, in association with National College of Ireland and Dun Laoghaire Institute of Art, Design & Technology (IADT). The main aim of this report is to investigate the prevalence of bullying among students in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland. ABC is a university designated research centre located in DCU Institute of Education, dedicated but not limited to researching bullying in different contexts, including higher education, the workplace, school, and the online world. The Centre was the first of its kind in Ireland to conduct research on different forms of bullying, including school bullying workplace bullying, homophobic bullying, and cyberbullying. The Centre works to solve the real-world issue of bullying and promote online safety through the extensive collaboration of academic, community and industry partnerships. ABC is an internationally renowned research centre and hosts the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Chair on Bullying and Cyberbullying.

This report presents the findings of an anonymous online survey examining the prevalence and impact of bullying and related negative experiences among students across higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ireland. This survey was commissioned by The Department for Further and Higher Education, Innovation and Science. The survey included five areas a) Demographic variables, including gender, age, ethnicity and sexual orientation; b) Respondents’ awareness of bullying in Higher Education; c) Exposure to online/offline bullying in the institution, as targets, witnesses (i.e., bystanders) and perpetrators; d) Individual variables that - based on previous literature - may be related to bullying in higher education, such as prejudice towards minority groups; e) Contextual variables, including institutional culture and implementation of anti-bullying policies. A total of 2,573 students aged between 18 and 65+ engaged with the online survey. Of these, the three most frequent identities were 65% female, 25.3% male, and 2.8% identified as Other. 2.7% did not disclose their gender identity. Data were collected during the first semester of 2022/2023 academic year, as students were returning to first semester after remote learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Findings showed that just under a fifth of higher education students (18.4%) endured negative acts (such as bullying online or offline) over the last academic year. 

Of these, 16.6% of the entire sample occasionally (“now and then”) endured negative acts (such as bullying in offline or online). The most commonly experienced type of negative acts experienced “now and then” in offline scenarios were “being gossiped about in real life” (37.5%). In comparison, the most commonly experienced type of negative acts experienced “now and then” in online scenarios were “gossiped about on social media by another student” (11.9%). Almost a quarter (23.1%) of respondents who experienced negative acts reported being bullied for several months.

In the majority of cases, the perpetrator of bullying was another student on the same course (37.1%), or another student in the same HEI (23.4%). Other identified perpetrators were less frequently reported, such as a lecturer/professor (9.6%). Students registered as full-time experienced more negative acts (18.7%) than those registered as Part-time (16%).

Overall, minority groups, such as ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ respondents and respondents with a neuro diversity or disability were more likely to endure negative acts at College or University, such as bullying and cyberbullying compared to majority groups (i.e., those who identified as heterosexuals, ethnic majority groups and respondents with no disabilities or no neuro diversity).

In relation to students with a disability or neurodiversity, respondents who identified as having an ongoing Illness reported the highest levels of negative experiences “Every Now and Then” (50%). In contrast, respondents with a Neurological condition reported the highest levels of “Daily” negative acts, such as bullying or cyberbullying (12.5%). Respondents who reported being Deaf, hard of hearing, Blind, or visually impaired, or having a physical or mobility-related disability reported no negative experiences.

With respect to witnessing incidents of negative acts, 31.6% of respondents indicated that they had witnessed bullying at their College/University in the past year. 59.1% of those that witnessed bullying reported that they had taken action to help the target when confronted with bullying.

In most cases, those who reported experiences of bullying others, identified “gossiping about someone” as the most frequent behaviour “Every now and then” (37.3%) and “excluding someone from an in-person group” (15.6%). Other behaviours such as “picking on others in an online game” (0.8%) and “picking on someone in real life (2.2%) were less frequently reported. The majority of respondents who were targeted were not sure why this was the case (“Don’t know why”,45.7%), or said this was due to another unspecified reason ( “Other”,27.6%), due to “Physical Appearance” (18.3%) and “Gender” (10.5%).

Although 42.4% of survey respondents were aware that their institution had an anti-bullying policy, 56.6% were unsure whether their HEI had an anti-bullying policy and 1% reported that their institution did not have an anti-bullying policy. 35.8% “Strongly agreed” that bullying is against the values of their College/University. 16.5% “Strongly agreed” that their college makes an active effort to tackle bullying (e.g. through awareness raising initiatives and anti-bullying programmes). Only 11.5% of respondents “Strongly agreed” that Bullying goes unnoticed in my college.

Overall, these findings offer an overview of bullying experiences endured by students within HEIs in Ireland. Providing HEI students and staff with further awareness raising initiatives and training opportunities along with a continued and sustainable effort towards a more inclusive culture are among the recommended strategies to challenge negative acts such as bullying and cyberbullying in HEIs.

Bullying is a multifaceted phenomenon, which impacts people in different ways, making it difficult to define. There are however well-defined typologies of bullying, from verbal and relational aggression to physical and cyber-related actions (Stives, May, Pilkinton, Bethel, Eakin, 2022). This foundational knowledge is largely built upon the seminal work of Olweus (1978) which provided a pathway for researchers to explore the prevalence, typologies, locations, and interventions to contemporary bullying (Harcourt, Jasperse, & Green, 2014; Meriläinen, Puhakka and Sinkkonen, 2015). 

Whilst there are numerous definitions of bullying; for the purposes of this report, we will adopt the following understanding, which is adapted from UNESCO (2021):

Bullying is in-person behaviour between students within a social network that causes physical, emotional, or social harm to targeted students. When such behaviour takes place online it is referred to as cyberbullying or online bullying. Bullying is typically characterised by an imbalance of power that is enabled or inhibited by the social and institutional norms and context of schools and the education system.

As an emerging phenomenon within bullying literature, cyberbullying presents a growing challenge for the higher education sector. Similarly difficult to define, the use of technology to carry out online negative acts has been described as; a form of covert psychological bullying using electronic devices such as email, mobile phones, text messages, video clips, instant messaging, photographs and personal websites in order to engage in repeated hostile behaviour intended to harm another person or persons (O’Moore, 2012). The challenges surrounding cyberbullying are quickly becoming even more complex as technologies continue to rapidly evolve and harmful experiences such as cyber hate, simulated groping, (Hinduja, 2022), digital rankism, Cyberflashing, cyberstalking, doxing, non-consensualsharing of images, deepfakes, cancelling, creepshottingand technology-facilitated coercive control (Ging, 2023) all exist within platforms that are characterised by affordances of persistence, replicability, scalability, and searchability (Boyd, 2011), where perpetrators can act with near-anonymous pseudonymity (Milosevic, Collier, & Norman, 2022).

Within higher education there is a pressing need to further explore these growing trends. Emerging interventions and preventions to negative acts, such as the potential use of artificial intelligence to monitor online toxicity (Gordon, Lam, Sung par, Patel, Hancock, Hashimoto & Bernstien, 2022), as well as underlying policies that govern learner safety in multiple ecologies (Culloty, Milosevic, Park, Flynn, Ging, O’Higgins Norman, Suiter, 2021) are needed steps in the right direction. Despite these however, it is important to note that regardless of technological sophistication, the data which trains such AI algorithms mirrors our society as it exists, for better or worse and represents our existing biases in a multi-ecological world (Wachter, Mittelstadt and Russell, 2021; Malek, 2022).

The topic of bullying, both in schools and in the workplace has been a focus of interest to researchers and policy makers alike (Mazzone, Jones, Freeney & O’Higgins Norman, 2022). Despite this however, there exists a dearth of information on bullying experiences among and against students in higher education. The risks of bullying and cyberbullying do not end when learners transition from post-primary education into Higher Education. In fact, research indicates that between 5-7% of university students have been bullied during their studies (Meriläinen, Puhakka and Sinkkonen, 2014). There is a dearth of information on how negative acts are experienced, as well as where these episodes of bullying or cyberbullying can be experienced.

The importance of socialising and learning inside as well as outside of the classroom is well established and can be traced back to Dewey’s (1916) original assertion that “learning in the process of living is the finest product of schooling”. This philosophy compliments the growing rise in work-based learning experiences such as “work placement” or “practicums” (Sewell et al., 2009; Sheridan and Linehan, 2013) and indeed apprenticeship programmes. In the context then of being a student in these outside class experiences, (including informal roles in student clubs or societies), it is essential to consider how bullying or cyberbullying is experienced and affected by complex power dynamics (Oblath, Greif Green, Guzmán, Felix, Furlong, Holt, Sharkey, 2020). Evidence suggests that within these significant and impactful experiences, there can be instances of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal bullying (De Cieri, Sheehan, Donohue, Shea, and Cooper, 2019).

Top-down bullying can involve for example, a placement mentor, tutor, or supervisor bullying a student worker, Horizontal bullying could occur in cases where students in the same placement are bullying each other. Bottom-up bullying involves a subordinate bullying an elevated supervisor, or for instance, a student perpetrating negative acts against a lecturer, professor, or administrator. As reported in earlier research (Mazzone, Jones, Freeney & O’Higgins Norman, 2022), instances of top-down bullying are more frequently reported compared to bottom-up bullying incidents (De Cieri et al., 2019). Despite this, previous research has identified a shifted power dynamic whereby individuals with less “formal power” may attempt to exert control over a person with greater authority or status (May & Tenzek, 2018). For example, students may heckle female lecturers or make misogynistic comments in module evaluations, as documented by Jackson and Sunduram’s (2015) study of Lad Culture in UK universities.

Finally, it is important to note that episodes of negative experiences, such as bullying or cyberbullying do not only represent interactions between perpetrators and targets. Bystander behaviour (the behaviour of those who witness bullying online or offline) is an integral part of the sociology of bullying and has been shown to affect interventions and (de)‐escalation of bullying scenarios in formal settings (Paull, Omari and Standen, 2012; Donoghue, 2022).

In consideration of these points, the primary goal of this research was to establish a deeper understanding into the experiences of bullying among and against students in higher education, which as Kiilakoski, (2012) highlights is complicated as; “there are more players than before. The Field has widened from local to global. The rules are in a state of flux”.

This survey study has been commissioned by the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science. The study aims to: 

  1. Establish the prevalence and impact of bullying and cyberbullying among survey respondents with different characteristics in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation, neurodiversity, and disability.
  2. Investigate the profile of the perpetrators of bullying and cyberbullying.
  3. Examine respondents’ experiences of witnessing bullying.
  4. Examine bystanders’ response to bullying.
  5. Investigate respondents’ perception of the anti-bullying culture at their institution and their awareness of the anti-bullying policies.

2.1 Procedure 

Twenty-four (24) publicly funded HEIs across Ireland were invited to participate in this study. The target population included an estimate of 240,000 students. Contact points for each of the 24 HEIs were given information concerning the objectives of this survey study for circulation to their students. 

2.2 Survey 

This report draws on the results of an anonymous survey conducted with the population of students in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Ireland. The survey consisted of five sections covering 1) Demographics; 2) Negative acts such as bullying and cyberbullying 3) Bystander and perpetrator behaviour; 4) Anti-bullying culture and awareness of anti-bullying policies; 5) Information on the instruments included in the survey can be found in the Appendix.

2,573 students (1% of students in the HEI’s sampled in this study) aged between 18 and 65+ (65% female, 25.3% male; and 2.8% identified as Other). 2.7% did not disclose their gender identity. Most respondents (70.6%) identified themselves as Irish; 13.5% belonged to another White ethnic group; 0.9% preferred not to disclose their ethnic group. 33.77% of survey respondents identified themselves as LGBTQ+3 (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and other sexual orientations not listed in the survey). Overall, 11% reported a disability or a neuro diversity. (See Table 1 for more details on the sample demographics).

The present survey investigated student’s experiences of bullying in Higher Education along with their awareness of anti-bullying policies and their perception of the anti-bullying culture within their institutions.

The findings of this survey study are important for HEI Leaders and policymakers at the national and organisational level as they assist in focussing on potential strategies to prevent experiences of negative acts such as bullying and cyberbullying among and between HEI students. Some of the key recommendations following from this survey study include: 

  • Awareness, Education and Training.
  • Supports for Faculty
  • Implementing evidence-based support programmes.
  • Supporting targets of bullying and bystanders.
  • Developing and promoting anti-bullying policies in consultation with all stakeholders.
  • Ongoing research to further explore and monitor the prevalence of bullying in HEIs.
  • Ongoing research to further explore the typologies of negative acts experienced in person and online.

Appendix


Survey

 

 

Plain Language Statement

Survey of the Experiences of Higher Education Students in Ireland

 

Informed Consent Sheet 

Informed Consent Sheet 

Anonymous Online Informed Consent Form 

I give my consent to participate in this survey and understand that I may withdraw from the survey at any point.

By ticking each box below, you consent to participating in this survey: 

□ I confirm that I have read and understood the Plain Language Statement 

□ I understand the information provided 

□ I understand the information provided in relation to data protection 

□ I understand that I may withdraw from this survey at any point 

□ I understand that confidentiality of information provided is subject to legal limitations 

□ I confirm that I had the opportunity to ask questions and received satisfactory answers 

□ I consent to participate in this survey


Survey Instrument 

Experiences of Bullying within Higher Education. 

(Q1) Participant Information Sheet 

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. We have provided some information about this research project below. 

What is this survey about? 

This survey is about student-related experiences in higher education institutions. This survey includes three sections (TBC): 

Who are the people conducting the research? 

This research is being conducted by Dr Michael Goldrick and Prof. James O'Higgins Norman of the DCU Anti-Bullying Centre (ABC) at Dublin City University. 
This survey has been facilitated by the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science. If you have any important questions regarding the contents of this survey, please contact michael.goldrick@dcu.ie 
Information regarding the aims of this survey is provided below. 

What will my participation involve?

This survey will take about 15 minutes to complete. The ideal setting for filling out the survey is a quiet environment, where you do not feel observed and can respond accurately to the questions included in this survey. Your participation in this survey is voluntary and it should not entail any risk in either your personal or student life. Please note that there are no right or wrong answers. Therefore, it is very important that your answers reflect your personal thoughts, experiences, and feelings. 

Benefits of participation 

By choosing to participate in this research survey, you will get the chance to reflect on your student-related experiences. Your participation will inform policy and best practices in Higher Education Institutions and will help practitioners to create a better learning environment.

How will the data be stored? 

The survey will not collect any personal identifiable information on you. Aggregate data from the study participants will contribute to the overall research findings. Your data will be stored securely using passwords for the survey software and will not be accessed by anyone outside of the research team (subject to legal limitations). The data will be collected anonymously and protected in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - 2016/679 and will be stored for 5 years after completion of the research in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998. Please do not provide any information (e.g. name, surname, etc.) that could be used to identify you. 

Any individual wishing to exercise their Data Subject Rights should contact the DCU Data Protection Officer at data.protection@dcu.ie 

How will the data be used? 

Your participation in this research is entirely voluntary. You may close this survey at any point. 
Please note that if you withdraw from the survey, the data collected up to your withdrawal will be used as detailed in this participant information sheet. This is because this survey does not collect any identifiable information that could be linked to your own answers. 

The research findings will be used to inform policy and practice in Irish Higher Education Institutions. Findings will also be used for writing papers for publication in scientific journals, and for presenting the findings of this survey at academic conferences. 

Independent contact 

If you wish to liaise with an independent person about this survey, please contact the Dublin City University Research Ethics Committee at rec@dcu.ie


(Q2) Consent Form 

I give my consent to participate in this survey and understand that I may withdraw from the survey at any point. By ticking each box below, you consent to completing this survey: 

□ I confirm that I have read and understood the Participant Information Sheet (1) 

□ I understand the information provided (2)

□ I understand the information provided in relation to data protection (3)

□ I understand that I may withdraw from this survey at any point (4)

□ I understand that confidentiality of information provided is subject to legal limitations (5)

□ I confirm that I had the opportunity to ask questions and received satisfactory answers (6)

□ I consent to participate in this survey (7)

We now need some general information about you. Please note that data is collected and help confidentially. 

To understand your answers for statistical research purposes, we would be grateful if you could provide us with some personal demographic information. Where you do not wish to disclose information, please choose the "Prefer not to answer" option.


Demographic information

(Q3) Part 1. 
We now need some general information about you. Please note that data is collected and held confidentially. 

To understand your answers for statistical research purposes, we would be grateful if you could provide us with some personal demographic information. Where you do not wish to disclose information, please choose the "prefer not to say" option.

(Q4) Are you over the age of 18?

□ Yes
□ No 

(Q5) Are you a registered student in a third level institution?

□ Yes
□ No 

(Q6) What gender (if any) do you identify with? Please choose one of the following:

□ Cisgender woman (female)
□ Cisgender man (male)
□ Transgender woman
□ Transgender man
□ Trans feminine person
□ Trans masculine person
□ Non-binary person
□ Agender person
□ Gender non-conforming person
□ Genderqueer
□ Other

(Q7) What sexual orientation do you identify with? 

□ Asexual
□ Gay 
□ Lesbian 
□ Bisexual 
□ Queer 
□ Straight/heterosexual 
□ Pansexual
□ Questioning
□ Other
□ Prefer not to say

(Q8) Please indicate your age group: 

□ 18-24 
□ 25-34 
□ 35-44 
□ 45-54 
□ 55-64 
□ 65+ 
□ Prefer not to say

(Q9) With which ethnic group do you most identify? 

(The categories below are informed by the Central Statistics Office for Census (2022))

□ Chinese 
□ Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi 
□ Any other Asian background 
□ African 
□ Any other Black background 
□ Arabic 
□ Mixed background 
□ Other 
□ Irish 
□ Irish Traveller 
□ Roma 
□ Any other White background 
□ Prefer not to say

(Q10) Do you have any functional diversity? 

□ Yes 
□ No 
□ Prefer not to say 

(Q11) What is your functional diversity? 

□ Specific learning difficulty e.g., dyslexia, dyscalculia 
□ Physical or mobility related disability 
□ Blind or visually impaired 
□ Deaf or hard of hearing 
□ Mental health difficulty 
□ ASD or Aspergers 
□ ADHD or ADD 
□ Significant ongoing illness 
□ Neurological (incl. Epilepsy and Brain injury)
□ Other (please specify) 
□ Prefer not to say 

(Q12) What is your religion? 

□ Muslim
□ Hindus 
□ Orthodox
□ Roman Catholic
□ Buddhism
□ Jewish
□ Church of Ireland (including Protestant)
□ No religion
□ Other (Please specify)

(Q13) What type of college do you attend? 

□ Institute of Technology 
□ University 
□ Technological University
□ College of Further Education
□ Private College

(Q14) What type of description best fits your current status as a student? 

□ Are you a Full time Student?
□ Are you a Part-time Student?

(Q15) Are you on an exchange programme (such as Erasmus)

□ Yes 
□ No 

(Q16) What qualification should you receive at the end of your course? 

□ Higher Certificate (NFQ Level 6) 
□ Diploma
□ Degree (NFQ Level 7)
□ Honours Degree (NFQ Level 8)
□ Postgraduate Diploma (NFQ Level 8/9)
□ Taught Masters Degree (NFQ Level 9)
□ Research Masters Degree (NFQ Level 9)
□ PhD /EdD / (NFQ Level 10)
□ Other (please specify) 

(Q17) What is your current main area of study? 

□ Education 
□ Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction 
□ Humanities & Arts
□ Agriculture/Veterinary 
□ Social Science 
□ Health/Welfare 
□ Business 
□ Sport 
□ Law 
□ Catering 
□ Science 
□ Services 
□ Maths/Computing/Computer Science 
□ Other (please specify)

(Q18) How many years long is the course in total?

□ 1 Year
□ 2 Years
□ 3 Years
□ 4 Years
□ 5 Years
□ 6 Years / more than 6 Years

(Q19) What year of the course are you currently in? 

□ 1 Year
□ 2 Years
□ 3 Years
□ 4 Years
□ 5 Years
□ 6 Years / more than 6 Years


(Q20) PART 2:

Experiences within social learning environments

Here are some questions related to your experiences in College and social learning environments, whether that be in real life, or online. Please note that there are no right or wrong answers. We are interested in your actual experiences, feelings and thoughts. 

Please read each question carefully before answering:

A Note on Bullying and Cyber bullying

Bullying is in-person behaviour between students within a social network that causes physical, emotional, or social harm to targeted students. When such behaviour takes place online it is referred to as cyberbullying or online bullying. Bullying is typically characterised by an imbalance of power that is enabled or inhibited by the social and institutional norms and context of schools and the education system. As an example of power imbalance, a fellow student who engages in bullying perpetration may have more social support (better social capital), which can facilitate bullying behaviour. Power imbalance can also result from a formal hierarchical structure such as an instructor/professor having more power than a student. The key aspect of bullying rests on the subjective perception of the target that acts are hostile, humiliating or intimidating and that they are directed at the target. 

All answers provided are anonymous and confidential.

Please note the questions in this section may cause stress or be upsetting for some.

(Q21) Have you experienced any of the following acts within college and social learning environments?

 

Never

Now and Then

Monthly

Weekly

Daily

Prefer not to say

I was excluded from a group in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I received unfair or unequal treatment in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was called names in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was gossiped about in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was reprimanded by someone in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was picked on, belittled, or exposed to public ridicule in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

Inappropriate assignments were set for me

O

O

O

O

O

O

Inappropriate content was assigned to class by Tutor/Lecturer/Professor

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was stalked on campus (repeated, unwanted behaviour that caused you to feel distressed or scared).

O

O

O

O

O

O

I experienced hazing to join a society on campus (forced you into committing an act that creates a risk for harm, to be initiated into an organization)

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was physically intimidated/threatened

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had someone coming too close to me, repeatedly

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was sexually harassed on campus

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had personal items forcibly taken from me

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had threatening gestures made towards me

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was harassed online by an individual in my college (for example, bombarded with multiple unwanted messages or images)

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was impersonated by another student online (sent messages/contacted people pretending to be me).

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had photos of me shared with other college students online, without my permission.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had an embarrassing video of me shared, without my permission.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had my personal details shared online.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was excluded from my online curricular groups (Such as virtual learning environments, Moodle, Loop, Blackbird, Teams).

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was excluded from my extra-curricular online groups (such as clubs and society pages, sports team pages, special interest group pages).

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was stalked online by an individual from my college.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was gossiped about on social media by another student from my college

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was tricked online into giving another student my college work

O

O

O

O

O

O

I had some nude/semi-nude photos of me shared online.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was subjected to online hazing to join a society.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was harassed by an individual in my college through text messages.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was harassed by an individual in my college through College emails

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was harassed by an individual in my college through Personal emails

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was harassed through Instant messaging (for example, Whattsapp, Telegram, Facebook chat, Instagram)

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was picked on, belittled, or exposed to public ridicule during an Online Game

O

O

O

O

O

O

Other (please specify) ____________________________________________

(Q22) The person(s) perpetrating the above was/is

□ Not applicable. (redirect to next question)
□ Student in my course
□ Another student in my college
□ Someone in a society I joined.
□ Someone on a sports team I joined
□ Tutor
□ Lecturer/Professor
□ Research supervisor
□ Manager in the college
□ Administrative staff
□ Support services staff
□ Someone else (please list your connection to this person).
□ A stranger online

(Q23) Did you change your behaviour as a result of these negative experiences in the last academic year? (please tick all that apply)

□ I took time out of college
□ I am going to drop out of course
□ I am thinking of changing course
□ I am thinking of changing college
□ I didn’t go to certain classes
□ I didn’t participate in certain classes
□ I dropped out of a society
□ I dropped out of a sports/ esports team
□ I stopped going to the on-campus gym
□ I try not to be alone on-campus (stay with one or more people)
□ I avoid certain areas of campus (where I feel vulnerable).
□ I avoid certain online student groups

(Q24) Thinking of the negative experiences above, did they have a negative impact on you in relation to any of the following?

□ Motivation to attend college
□ Lowered self esteem
□ Anxiousness
□ Feelings of embarrassment/humiliation
□ Sadness
□ Feeling depressed.
□ Feelings of anger
□ Other (please specify)

(Q25) Do you feel that you were targeted as a result of any of the following?

□ My sexual orientation
□ My gender
□ Being transgender
□ Having a disability
□ My race
□ My religion
□ My age
□ My ethnicity
□ My physical appearance
□ No idea why I was bullied on campus
□ Other (please specify)

(Q26) Did you experience bullying at post-primary (secondary) school?

□ Yes □ No

(Q27) If yes, how long did the bullying last?

□ Less than a week
□ Around a week.
□ Less than a month
□ A few months
□ Roughly a year
□ Multiple years


Now let’s look at experiences you may have had as a result of work experience as a requirement for your course.

(Q28) Did you go on work placement / practicum during the last academic year as part of the requirement for your college course?

□ Yes □ No

(Q29) If yes, have you experienced any of the following acts from a senior colleague, mentor, placement tutor, or peer?

 

Never

Now and Then

Monthly

Weekly

Daily

Prefer not to say

Someone withholding information which affects your performance

O

O

O

O

O

O

Spreading gossip and rumours about you

O

O

O

O

O

O

Being ignored or excluded

O

O

O

O

O

O

Having insulting or offensive remarks made about your person, attitudes or private life

O

O

O

O

O

O

Being shouted at or being the target of spontaneous rage

O

O

O

O

O

O

Repeated reminders of your errors or mistakes

O

O

O

O

O

O

Being ignored or facing a hostile reaction when you approach someone at work

O

O

O

O

O

O

Persistent criticism of your work and effort

O

O

O

O

O

O

Practical jokes carried out by people you don't get along with

O

O

O

O

O

O

Received messages that have a disrespectful tone

O

O

O

O

O

O

Been unfairly blamed for work-related problems

O

O

O

O

O

O

Received aggressively worded messages (e.g. using all capital letters, bold font or multiple exclamation marks)

O

O

O

O

O

O

Had a staff member copy people into messages that reflect poorly on you

O

O

O

O

O

O

Had your work unfairly criticised

O

O

O

O

O

O

Received rude demands from a colleague

O

O

O

O

O

O

Been sent conflicting information

O

O

O

O

O

O

Been bypassed in group communications that are relevant to your placement role

O

O

O

O

O

O

Been the subject of communications that undermine you

O

O

O

O

O

O

Received unreasonable work demands

O

O

O

O

O

O

Been pressured into responding to technology-mediated communications at all times

O

O

O

O

O

O

(Q30) The person(s) perpetrating the above was/is (please choose all that apply)

□ A senior colleague
□ A peer
□ A Mentor
□ A student
□ A Placement Tutor
□ Other (please specify)

(Q31) Thinking of the negative experiences above, did they have a negative impact on you in terms of your general wellbeing?

 

I felt/I feel

Never Seldom Sometimes Often Never
Sad and in a bad mood (1)

O

O

O

O

O

Tense and nervous (2)

O

O

O

O

O

Inactive and with low energy (3)

O

O

O

O

O

Tired and unrested when waking up (4)

O

O

O

O

O

(Q32) Did you report these experiences to anyone?

□ Yes □ No (if no, redirect to debrief)

(Q33) If yes, who did you report to?

□ Friend
□ Lecturer
□ Parent
□ Tutor
□ Student union
□ Student rep
□ College counsellor


Part 3: Experiences of Bullying Others

This next part considers any experiences you may have had of bullying others. All answers provided are anonymous and confidential. Please note the questions in this section may cause stress or be upsetting for some.

(Q34) Have you carried out any of the following acts within college and / or social learning environments?

 

Never

Now and Then

Monthly

Weekly

Daily

Prefer not to say

I discriminated against someone            
I excluded someone from a group in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I excluded someone from an online group

O

O

O

O

O

O

I treated someone unfairly, with unequal treatment

O

O

O

O

O

O

I called someone names

O

O

O

O

O

O

I gossiped about someone

O

O

O

O

O

O

I reprimanded someone

O

O

O

O

O

O

I picked on, belittled, or exposed someone to public ridicule in real life.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I expressed contempt to someone

O

O

O

O

O

O

I stalked someone on campus

O

O

O

O

O

O

I was involved in hazing, to allow someone to join a society on campus

O

O

O

O

O

O

I physically intimidated someone.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I sexually harassed someone on campus

O

O

O

O

O

O

I took personal items from someone

O

O

O

O

O

O

I made threatening gestures towards someone in real life

O

O

O

O

O

O

I made threatening gestures towards someone online

O

O

O

O

O

O

I harassed through Instant messaging (for example, WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook chat, Instagram)

O

O

O

O

O

O

I picked on, belittled, or exposed to public ridicule during an Online Game.

O

O

O

O

O

O

I harassed an individual in my college through College emails

O

O

O

O

O

O

I harassed an individual in my college through personal emails

O

O

O

O

O

O

(Q35) Who did you direct these acts towards?

□ Student in my course
□ Another student in my college
□ Tutor
□ Lecturer/Professor
□ Research supervisor
□ Manager in the college
□ Admin staff
□ Someone else (please list your connection to this person).
□ Prefer not to say


Part 4.

Now let’s look at witnessing bullying and/or cyberbullying of someone in your college.

(Q36) Have you ever witnessed any form of bullying on campus or cyberbullying?

□ Yes □ No

(Q37) (If yes), Have you tried to intervene?

□ Yes □ No

(Q38) What did you do to intervene?

□ Spoke to the person being bullied on campus to see if I could help/support them.
□ Contacted a lecturer
□ Contacted a Student rep.
□ Told the person bullying to stop it.
□ I stepped in to stop the bullying at the time.
□ I sent a DM to the bully to tell them to stop
□ Contacted other class members to tell them about the bullying situation.

(Q39) What was the outcome of your actions?

Please state:

(Q40) (If no intervention) why did you not intervene?

□ Afraid for myself, that I would be next
□ Afraid it would get worse for the person being bullied
□ None of my business
□ Thought someone else would intervene
□ Person should be able to handle it themselves at college
□ I didn’t know how to help
□ Felt it was too dangerous to intervene
□ I was friends with the bully
□ I didn’t know the victim well

(41) Please choose the option that best describes your level of agreement to the below statements:

  Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly Agree
My college actively discourages bullying

O

O

O

O

O

Bullying is against the values of my college

O

O

O

O

O

My college makes an active effort to tackle bullying (e.g. through awareness raising initiatives and anti-bullying programmes)

O

O

O

O

O

Bullying goes unnoticed in my college

O

O

O

O

O

(42) Does your college have an anti-bullying policy?

□ Yes □ No □ Unsure


References

Banks, JA, , Kathryn H. Au, Arnetha F. Ball, Philip Bell, Edmund W. Gordon, Kris D. Gutiérrez, Shirley Brice Heath, Carol D. Lee, Yuhshi Lee, Jabari Mahiri, Na’ilah Suad Nasir, Guadalupe Valdés, Min Zhou (2007). Learing in and out of school in diverse environments. The LIFE Center (The Learning in Informal and Formal Environments Center), University of Washington, Stanford University, and SRI International

Bigelow, B. (1997). On the Road to Cultural Bias: A Critique of The Oregon Trail CD-ROM. Language Arts, 74(2), 84–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41482844

Boyd, Danah (2011) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Papacharissi Z (ed.), A Networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites, New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58. 

Belongto National School Climate Survey 2019. https://cif.ie/2019/05/17/national-school-climate-survey-frombelong-to/…;

Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (in press). Social Media Use and Adolescents’ Well-Being: Developing a Typology of Person Specific Effect Patterns. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196 

Central Statistics Office. Census Ireland (2022) https://www.cso.ie/en/census/ 

Chapell, M. S., Casey, D., De la Cruz, C., Ferrell, J., Forman, J., Lipkin, S., & Newsham, G. (2004). Bullying in college by students and teachers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 665-692. http://sites.tamuc.edu/bullyingjournal/article/bullies-and-victims-in-higher-education/

Christine K. Malecki, M.K, Demaray, TJ. Smith, J.E (2020) Disability, poverty, and other risk factors associated with involvement in bullying behaviors, Journal of School Psychology, Vol 78.

De Cieri, H., Sheehan, C., Donohue, R., Shea, T. and Cooper, B. (2019), "Workplace bullying: an examination of power and perpetrators", Personnel Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 324-341. 

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York, NY: Free Press. Donoghue, C (2022) Sociology of Bullying : Power, Status, and Aggression Among Adolescents. New York. NYU Press. 

Duffy, M. & Brown, J. E. (2018). Best practices in psychotherapy for targets of workplace bullying and mobbing. In Duffy, M. & Yamada, D. C. (Eds.) Workplace bullying and mobbing in the United States, Volume 2 (pp. 291-314). ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, USA. 

Eileen Culloty, Tijana Milosevic, Kirsty Park, Roderick Flynn, Debbie Ging, James O’Higgins Norman, Jane Suiter, 2021 The General Scheme of the Online Safety and Media Regulation Bill. Submission to the Joint Committee on Media, Tourism, Arts, Culture, Sport and the Gaeltacht.

Fahie, D. (2020). The lived experience of toxic leadership in Irish higher education. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 13(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-07-2019-0096 

Ging, D. (2023) ‘Tactics of Hate: Toxic "Creativity" in Anti-feminist Men’s Rights Politics’ IN Boyle, K. and Berridge, S. (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Gender, Media and Violence. Routledge.

Gordon, M, Lam, M, Sung par, J, Patel, K, Hancock, J, Hashimoto, T, Bernstien, M.S (2022) Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine. CHI ’22, April 29-May 5, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA. 

Harcourt, S., Jasperse, M., & Green, V. A. (2014). “We were sad and we were angry”: A systematic review of parents’ perspectives on bullying. Child & Youth Care Forum, 43(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-014-9243-4

Health and Safety Authority, HSA. (2021). Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work. https://www.hsa.ie/eng/publications_and_forms/publications/codes_of_practice/code_of_practice_for_employers_and_employees_on_the_prevention_and_resolution_of_bullying_at_work.pdf

Hodgins, M., & Mannix-McNamara, P. M. (2019). An Enlightened Environment? Workplace Bullying and Incivility in Irish Higher Education. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019894278 

Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 984–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9153-3 

Hutchinson, M., & Jackson, D. (2015). The construction and legitimation of workplace bullying in the public sector: insight into power dynamics and organisational failures in health and social care. Nursing Inquiry, 22(1), 13–26.https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12077

Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. M., Rahman, M. A., & Islam, M. M. (2021). Cyberbullying detection in social media using artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 1-19. 

Jackson, Carolyn, and Vanita Sundaram. "Is ‘lad culture’a problem in higher education? Exploring the perspectives of staff working in UK universities." Final report, Society for Research into Higher Education. https://www. srhe. ac.uk/downloads/JacksonSundaramLadCulture. pdf (2015). 

Kiilakoski, T. (2012), Kasvatus teknologisessa maailmassa [Education in the technological world], Finnish Youth Research Society, Helsinki. 

Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Giga, N. M., Villenas, C. & Danischewski, D. J. (2016). The 2015 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN.

Le Menestrel, Suzanne. (2020). Preventing Bullying: Consequences, Prevention, and Intervention. Journal of Youth Development. 15. 8-26. 10.5195/jyd.2020.945. 

Li, D., Zhang, D., & Liu, Y. (2020). A chatbot-based intelligent antibullying system for online education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 33-47. 

Maguire, M (2001), 'Bullying and the Postgraduate Secondary School Trainee Teacher: An English Case Study', JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR TEACHING, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 95 - 109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470120042564 

Manrique M, Allwood MA, Pugach CP, Amoh N, Cerbone A (2020) Time and support do not heal all wounds: Mental health correlates of past bullying among college students. J Am Coll Health. Apr; 68 (3 ):227-235. 

Mazzone, A, Jones, É, Freeney, Y, O’Higgins Norman, J (2022) Report on the National Survey of Staff Experiences of Bullying in Irish HEIs. ISBN 978-1-911669-37-1. 

May, A., & Tenzek, K. E. (2018). Bullying in the academy: Understanding the student bully and the targeted ‘stupid, fat, mother fucker’ professor. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379482

Meriläinen, Matti & Puhakka, Helena & Sinkkonen, Hanna-Maija. (2014). Students' suggestions for eliminating bullying at a university. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 42. 1 - 14. 10.1080/03069885.2014.950943. 

Milosevic, T., Collier, A. & Norman, J.O. (2022) Leveraging Dignity Theory to Understand Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Children’s Rights. Int Journal of Bullying Prevention https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380- 022-00120-2 

Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics, 5, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S36456

Oblath R, Greif Green J, Guzmán J, Felix ED, Furlong MJ, Holt M, Sharkey J.(2020) Retrospective perceptions of power imbalance in childhood bullying among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2020 Nov-Dec; 68 (8) :891-899. 

Olweus, D (1996). The Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology Journal of Adolescent Health. 10.1037/t09634-000. 

Osatuke, K., Moore, S. C., Ward, C., Dyrenforth, S. R. & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW). Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 384-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886309335067 

Paull, M., Omari, M., & Standen, P. (2012). When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.x 

Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288 

Patchin, J & Hinduja, S. (2013). Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: Implications for Empirical Research. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 53. 431-2. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.030. 

Popp, Ann & Peguero, Anthony & Day, Kristin & Semprevivo, Lindsay. (2014). Gender, Bullying Victimization, and Education. Violence and Victims. 29. 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00047.

Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114-130 

Sewell, K., Cain, T., Woodgate‐Jones, A., & Srokosz, A. (2009). Bullying and the postgraduate trainee teacher: a comparative study. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 3- 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470802587087

Sinkkonen, Hanna-Maija & Puhakka, Helena & Meriläinen, Matti. (2012). Bullying at a university: Students' experiences of bullying. Studies in Higher Education - STUD HIGH EDUC. 39. 1-13. 10.1080/03075079.2011.649726. 

Sheridan, I. and Linehan, 2013, M. A Partnership Approach to Work Placement in Higher Education. Available from: https://www.tudublin.ie/media/website/for-students/careers/docs/A-Partn…

Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another Main Type of Bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x 

Staale Einarsen, Helge Hoel & Guy Notelaers (2009) Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised, Work & Stress, 23:1, 24-44, DOI: 10.1080/02678370902815673 

Stives, K. L., May, D. C., & Bethel, C. L. (2022). Parental Perspectives About What It Means to Bully. Journal of Family Issues, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X221129865 

Subair S. ‘Tayo, Solomon Temitope Adebola and Deborah Oreoluwa Yahya, 2019 Social Media: Usage and Influence on Undergraduate Studies in Nigerian Universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2019, Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 53-62