The UK Subvention and the Debate on a United Ireland: A Reply to Esmond Birnie’s Response to ‘Why the “Subvention” Does Not Matter: Northern Ireland and the All-Ireland Economy’
John Doyle
Irish Studies in International Affairs
School of Law and Government
Abstract

The UK Subvention and the Debate on a United IrelandA Reply to Esmond Birnie’s Response to ‘Why the “Subvention” Does Not Matter: Northern Ireland and the All-Ireland Economy’ by John Doyle John Doyle

I very much welcome Esmond Birnie’s contribution to this debate on the UK fiscal subvention to Northern Ireland and its implications for a united Ireland.1 It is a thoughtful and considered response, bringing new material to light and helping to focus on the key areas that remain uncertain.

Birnie’s new material is especially useful in terms of his analysis of the UK subvention, over time and both in constant prices and as a percentage of GDP. He highlights a clear political aspect of the subvention that I had neglected, i.e. the strong growth in the size of the subvention in the immediate post-Good Friday Agreement period. It is clear from his analysis that this growth is related to the election of the Blair Labour government in 1997, with its commitment to a higher level of public spending (at least until the war in Iraq). It is also clear that this growth stalled with the election of the British Conservatives, only growing again during the Covid-19 pandemic. This complex relationship between the subvention, politics and economic performance is interesting.