Environmental Law: Concepts and Skills

Briefly describe how you have integrated these themes into your module

This module bridges the gap between high-level diplomacy and classroom theory, drawing directly from firsthand experience within UN negotiations on decarbonizing international maritime transport at the International Maritime Organization (IMO). It offers students a rare look into the machinery of global environmental governance, moving beyond textbook definitions to explore the friction and synergy between international regimes.

1. The Multidimensional International Climate Change Regime
The curriculum examines the "regime complexes" formed by overlapping jurisdictions, such as:

1. UNFCCC: The cornerstone of global climate action.

2. Paris Agreement: Arguably the most significant development in international law stemming from the UNFCCC.

3. IMO: The primary UN body addressing sectoral emissions from shipping.

By analyzing these interactions, students learn that global policy does not exist in a vacuum; a decision in one forum often creates ripples—or roadblocks—in another.

2. The simulation
The centerpiece of the module is a simulated UN negotiation. After covering the foundations of international climate change law, each student selects a country to impersonate for a simulation of IMO negotiations.

2.1 The preparation phase
Students are provided with specific negotiation points inspired by ongoing, real-world IMO debates. To assist them, I provide a set of guiding questions designed to help them identify their country's specific interests regarding these points. Based on this research, students draft a mock submission to the IMO. To ensure professional quality, they are provided with actual UN submissions to study the requisite diplomatic style and formal structure.

2.2. The negotiation
Following the written submission, each student delivers an oral presentation. These interventions must remain consistent with the style of actual Member State delegations (guided by mock examples of actual speeches). Finally, students are assessed through an oral defense of their submission, testing their ability to think on their feet and navigate the complexities of multilateralism.

Briefly describe the impact you hope integrating these approaches will have on students who complete the module

From a content perspective, the module aims to help students grasp the importance and the complexity of addressing climate change through a multilateral process. Different nations enter the multilateral arena with diverging priorities—such as trade impacts, climate vulnerability, energy security, and sectoral concerns—and consequently reach different conclusions on how best to resolve common problems.

The shift from passive learning to multilateral negotiations, within this module represents a significant pedagogical evolution. By placing students at the center of a simulated diplomatic crisis, the curriculum moves beyond rote memorization toward a model of "learning by doing." The impact of this approach is multifaceted, focusing on the development of cognitive and professional competencies that are difficult to replicate in traditional lecture formats:

1. Higher-level critical thinking:  Students do not merely learn about international regimes; they are forced to synthesize conflicting data from the WTO, UNFCCC, and IMO to find viable legal pathways. They must evaluate trade-offs between environmental integrity and economic viability and identify core interests of the country they represent.

2. Self-directed learning: To successfully defend a treaty submission, students must become experts on their assigned nation’s domestic constraints and on the topic being negotiated. This fosters an intrinsic motivation to research deeply into technical aspects on international climate change law, key domestic priorities, and historical diplomatic stances.

3. Understanding multilateralism in action: Through the simulation, students experience the "friction" of global governance. They learn that consensus is not merely a goal but a process of negotiation, persuasion, and compromise.

The assessment structure is specifically designed to develop transferable skills, such as: strategic drafting, public speaking, and consensus-building. These are all highly transferable to careers in law, public policy, and corporate strategy.

By navigating the complexities of a "UN-style" forum, students gain a profound appreciation for the necessity of multilateral cooperation in an increasingly fractured global landscape. They exit the module not just as scholars of environmental governance, but as practitioners of international dialogue.

Related Sustainable Development Goals

Back to Compendium of Good Practice